{
   "share": {
      "comment_count": 0,
      "share_count": 973
   },
   "og_object": {
      "id": "1035263829906850",
      "description": "AlphaGo has demonstrated that a machine can learn how to do things that people spend many years of concentrated study learning, and it can rapidly learn how to do them better than any human can. Caliskan et al. now show that machines can learn word associations from written texts and that these associations mirror those learned by humans, as measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (see the Perspective by Greenwald). Why does this matter? Because the IAT has predictive value in uncovering the association between concepts, such as pleasantness and flowers or unpleasantness and insects. It can also tease out attitudes and beliefs\u2014for example, associations between female names and family or male names and career. Such biases may not be expressed explicitly, yet they can prove influential in behavior.\n\nScience , this issue p. [183][1]; see also p. [133][2]\n\n [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aal4230\n [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aan0649",
      "title": "Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases",
      "type": "article",
      "updated_time": "2018-02-06T22:28:16+0000"
   },
   "id": "http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6334/183"
}